In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Michael Derby <[email protected]> writes:

I was chatting with a power supply manufacturer who told me he had worked hard to design his power supply and get it through all the necessary regulations. When complete, he sent the design and instructions out to the manufacturing company.

After many of them had been made and sold, he realised the components in the power supply were all cheaper imitations of the components he had instructed the manufacturer to use.

This is VERY widespread. It's astonishing how many companies don't have an effective 'Goods Inwards Inspection' function, to use an archaic but very explicit term.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
The longer it takes to make a point, the more obtuse it proves to be.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion 
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to