In message
<[email protected]>,
dated Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Charlie Blackham <[email protected]>
writes:
Section 1.3.1 of the guidance document, that contains this phrase,
discusses whether or not antennas are covered by the R&TTE Directive.
I haven't any idea of what useful point you are making, if any. I think
you are indulging in pointless debate. If I'm wrong, please explain why
you think that whoever puts product A together with Product B (or B1,
B2, B3 etc.) to make a working system is not responsible for the
system's conformity with the RTTED.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
SHOCK HORROR! Dinosaur-like DNA found in chicken and turkey meals
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
