Amund,

Regarding your second paragraph, a cost-effective approach is to develop a Test 
Plan that specifies tests on a reasonable number of combinations, submit it to 
a Notified Body for review, then get the Notified Body Expert Opinion based on 
that plan and the test results.

Best Regards,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Amund Westin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [PSES] SV: [PSES] RTTE - Radio product or not

Thanks!
I see the 'intended function'  ... Agree that Item A should be handled as a 
radio product.
But it will be hard to make compliance to radio standards since the product 
Item, A is only a part of a total radio systems. Radio parameters according to 
ETSI / EN standards will not be able to check before a complete systems (Item A 
+ B) is running. These parameters will not be able to check before the complete 
system is running.

Let me just comment that Item A is made by a single manufacturer and Item B is 
made by manufacturer B and there are many possible Item B's on the market. 
Testing out all possible configurations of Itema A + Item B is considered 
unacceptable, since it will cover 95% of configurations which never will be 
used and it would also cost a huge amount of $$.

Thanks.

#Amund




-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sendt: 19. mars 2013 20:42
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Re: [PSES] RTTE - Radio product or not

In message
<[email protected]>,
dated Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Charlie Blackham <[email protected]>
writes:
>
>Product B isn’t a radio without product A attached, therefore product A
>is part of a radio system and the R&TTE Directive applies.

I would tentatively agree: in CENELEC long ago, the question was (half
seriously) raised as to whether a washing machine with a  microprocessor was a 
household appliance or ITE. The answer was  that the 'intended function' is 
definitive.

I think this can be extended to products like A and B, which are not intended 
to work alone but are components of a system. The 'intended function' of the 
system is a radio, so the component parts are 'radio'.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk SHOCK HORROR! Dinosaur-like 
DNA found in chicken and turkey meals John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and 
Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>


This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not 
the intended recipient: (1) you may not disclose, use, distribute, copy or rely 
upon this message or attachment(s); and (2) please notify the sender by reply 
e-mail, and then delete this message and its attachment(s). Underwriters 
Laboratories Inc. and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any errors, 
omissions, corruption or virus in this message or any attachments.

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to