In message
<[email protected]>,
dated Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Charlie Blackham <[email protected]>
writes:
My point is that you were, perhaps inadvertently, citing a section
talking about antennas as guidance for how to deal with Product A and
Product B scenario.
OK, now I understand. In my opinion, the *general* statement:
Where a radio system is integrated on site - as in the case of microwave
point-to-point and point-to-multipoint systems - the system integrators
responsible for ensuring compliance of the system with the Directive
when the system is brought into service.
applies precisely to the A + B1, B2, B3... case, irrespective of
appearing in a section on antennas. Since the A and the alternative B's
are from different manufacturers, it's most likely that they would be
brought together and connected on site, but the same applies if they are
brought together elsewhere by the system integrator.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
SHOCK HORROR! Dinosaur-like DNA found in chicken and turkey meals
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
