In message <[email protected]>,
dated Tue, 29 Oct 2013, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen"
<[email protected]> writes:
I think the real reason for this exception going unnoticed is simply
because they are shipped in small quantities (1 at a time). I now and
then buy Ebay stuff from the far-east without any ce marking and it
arrives always, in spite of clearly not being tested/ce marked or
compliant.
Go directly to jail. Do not collect 200 Euros.(;-)
I have taken steps to try to get the matter properly resolved, by
adopting in the EMCD the words from RoHS II quoted here, but I am not
in a position to give details.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
If dictionaries were correct, we would only need one, because they would all
give the same information.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
