You probably have not seen some of my employer's transformers. Some are big. Some are very big. But none are very very big. FWIW, there is also the UL486x series that, depending on material, start around 30AWG. Note the end-use equipment standard will typically reference a component standard; for example I would behold the glory of UL1561, IEC60076, and IEEE C57x to determine lug/connector requirements.
After returning from a day of testing 350kVA transformers at the factory, testing typical 200-500W stuff does not provide the requisite level of 'achievement'. Love the feel of big E and H fields unraveling my DNA. Brian -----Original Message----- From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 2:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [PSES] Wire lug nomenclature meaning? In message <924fdc0caa9e4252884684bdec5ee...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> , dated Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Brian Oconnell <[email protected]> writes: >Do not know about these specific types, but IEC61238 would have the >'correct' designations. This standard is for large lugs: the Scope clause says: .... conductors complying with IEC 60228 and IEC 60228A with cross-sectional areas 10 mm2 and greater for copper and 16 mm2 and greater for aluminium - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe) List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas <[email protected]> Mike Cantwell <[email protected]> For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: <[email protected]> David Heald: <[email protected]>
