UL 498, the U.S. standard for plugs and receptacles, requires testing for 1000 
insertion and removal cycles at the rated load. There is an additional test of 
100 cycles at 150% of the rated load. Tamper resistant receptacles, the type 
now required by the National Electrical Code for many residential purposes, 
must pass 5000 insertion and removal cycles.

IEC 60320 requires 1000 insertion cycles at the rated current and 3000 cycles 
with no current flowing for the connectors rated more than 0.2 A.

These are the minimum ratings. It is likely that some manufacturers have 
designed their products to perform to specification for a far greater number of 
cycles. I can conceive of applications that would easily exceed 1000 insertion 
cycles. One example I can think of would be receptacles in a bathroom. I've 
known a number of people who plug and unplug a hair dryer daily.

Ted Eckert
Compliance Engineer
Microsoft Corporation
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my 
employer.

From: Ed Price [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] "exercising" connections for health?


Without sending anyone off on a long search, does anyone have an idea about the 
number of mating cycles that the common consumer AC power connectors (like the 
USA NEMA-15 and Euro equivalents) are rated for?


Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA


-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 9:59 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] "exercising" connections for health?



In message

<ff616e8a3fc0497bab5fcbb17aaa6...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com<mailto:ff616e8a3fc0497bab5fcbb17aaa6...@blupr02mb116.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>>

, dated Tue, 27 May 2014, Brian Oconnell 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

writes:



>

>The immoral of these stories is that a connector, unless specifically

>rated for a certain insertion duty cycle, should not be subject to

>multiple re-insertion cycles. Components intended to interrupt load

>current and/or are rated for multiple insertion cycles should be ok and

>will serve the Empire well if used per the mfr's conditions of

>acceptability.



This is true, but for some widely-used connectors the manufacturers

either don't give a clear specification or, for insertions, quote an

incredibly low figure, which, if respected, would cause the connector to

be rejected.

--

OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See 
www.jmwa.demon.co.uk<http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk>

Nondum ex silvis sumus

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to 
unsubscribe)<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
David Heald <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to