In message
<a79213fd871f4f47900f8ffaa5b5c...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
, dated Mon, 8 Sep 2014, "Crane, Lauren" <[email protected]>
writes:
I guess the sensible approach is to consider the CENLEC's dop to dow
dates as a defacto transition period.
They are as far as CENELEC is concerned, but they are not established
legally, as CENELEC cannot do that. Normally, the Commission adopts the
same dates, but not always. The legal equivalent of the dow is the
docopocoss, of course.
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Quid faciamus nisi sit?
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
