In message
<04cab9802ba27a409548dd47de1da7efd3429c1...@slomailprd01.polycom.com>,
dated Fri, 10 Jul 2015, "Pearson, John" <[email protected]>
writes:
Also see Article 5 in its entirety over time limits. Cl 3 is important
and the way this is worded helps to add clarity to the 2 year time
limit (the "unless this presumption is incompatible with the nature of
the goods" bit)
Is your head spinning now?
Yes. I was going to complain about my calendar, because it lasted only a
year. (;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. With best wishes. See www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
When I turn my back on the sun, it's to look for a rainbow
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>
