" Preliminary EMI testing showed that there was no measurable impact on
conducted emissions when the second stage Y capacitors were removed."

Methinks this would be an unusual result for many power conversion and drive 
circuits, and too broad of a design statement for my simple little mind to 
cover. There is a reason for pi filters in this configuration.

So we have opposing forms of safety requirements and definitions of emissions 
test conditions. This is Mr Perkins' "Elephant".

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Nute [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 5:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] GFCI Nuisance Tripping

http://www.jonathankimball.com/pdf/gfci_ecce.pdf

-
----------------------------------------------------------------

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to