Hello Lauren

In general would call it Status Unknown.
The issues become how do you verify that it has not been tampered with while it 
was in an
uncontrolled environment?
Would you be able to tell if all the original required documents were included 
in the box with
the product?

Unless you are in the business of refurbishing equipment this may be hard to 
ascertain. Not
saying it can't be done but it is a non-trivial task.
Second question you need to ask is what is the impact of it being one way or 
the other? Is
their a liability if a piece of customer documentation is missing? Or if a 
component has been
replaced with an unapproved source?

Regards,


John
John   Merrill  |   Schneider Electric  |   USA  |   Industry Business  |   
Principal Product
Safety Engineer  |
Phone: 978 975 9710 |  ext:59710  |
Email: [email protected]  |   Site:www.schneider-electric.com 
 |   Address:
BostonOneCampus, 800 Federal St, Andover MA 01810  |
**** Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail****


                                                                                
                                                                                
    
  From:       "Crane, Lauren" <[email protected]>                     
                                                                                
    
                                                                                
                                                                                
    
  To:         [email protected],                                       
                                                                                
    
                                                                                
                                                                                
    
  Date:       03/17/2016 03:45 PM                                               
                                                                                
    
                                                                                
                                                                                
    
  Subject:    [PSES] UL Certification status of a re-sold UPS                   
                                                                                
    
                                                                                
                                                                                
    





Hello all,

I am looking for some insight on how to understand the certification status of 
a UPS that was
originally UL Certified but is being resold after having spent some time with 
another owner.

I see in the UL YEDU.GuideInfo for Uninterruptible Power-supply Equipment a 
paragraph which
says…

REBUILT PRODUCTS
This category also covers UPS equipment that is rebuilt by the original 
manufacturer or another
party having the necessary facilities, technical
knowledge and manufacturing skills. Rebuilt UPS equipment is rebuilt to the 
extent necessary by
disassembly and reassembly using new or
reconditioned parts. Rebuilt UPS equipment is subject to the same requirements 
as new UPS
equipment.

I think my basic question is – if an item is bought used and it bears a proper 
certification
mark, should one consider it still certified? Or, does certification only 
extend to the first
user, and if resold an item must be re-inspected to the original criteria and 
“certified
again”?

I think there is a difference between “re-sold” and “rebuilt”, but I’m not 
quite sure what the
details must be.


Lauren Crane
KLA-Tencor




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________
-
----------------------------------------------------------------


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To
post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <[email protected]>


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html


Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large
files, etc.


Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html


For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>


For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected]>
David Heald <[email protected]>

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc 
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to 
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html

Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at 
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used 
formats), large files, etc.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to