Scott,
In watching this thread it is clear that the technical
assessment and the regulatory certification are two separate issues but linked
by local law so we need to be cognizant of the regulatory environment.
The technical assessment (per the standard) is organized by an
ongoing group of (fallible) folks who work very hard to cover all of the risks
(usually) from the product manufacturers point of view (since they seem to
dominate the technical committees). Since the requirements are usually written
in retrospect from experience and, usually, not organized in a top down
approach (using the usual risk assessment tools – FMEA, etc) it is incomplete
is some (usually) unexpected ways – as you have discovered. When exposed, the
standards committee then scrambles to fill the hole identified. This is a
never ending process, approaching perfection asymptotically.
All this ignores the clever manufacturer who seeks out these holes and makes
use of them to gain advantage in some way.
The regulatory certification reflects the level of development
of the National bureaucracy responsible for setting requirements.
Additionally, the lobbying of legislators and bureaucrats by special interest
groups affects the final rules applied. So it ends up being a patchwork of
requirements that need to be applied by the manufacturer.
John Woodgate assures us that the world is happy with the UK approvals; check
it out carefully. Oh yes, a question – does Hong Kong or Singapore still use
the British plug design? What residual of this usage is still left in the
world?
All of this is the reason that you and I (and most of the
others on this net) have a meaningful job – once we get a little experience and
are willing to put up with the uncertainty regarding the roles of requirements
along with the varied level of enforcement by the legal jurisdictions.
You are uncomfortable with this hole in the requirements. When
we feel that the requirements or the application of requirements is either too
strict or too slack our only recourse is to get (directly or indirectly)
involved in fixing things (in which managers and technical folks excel) by
joining a technical committee or lobbying the political process that needs
fixing.
My advice is: pick your fights carefully and pursue them with
all you have – personal and corporate. You may even be successful in some of
the efforts.
So much philosophizing; good luck in fixing the world.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
IEEE Life Fellow
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
From: Scott Xe <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 9:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design of shutter opening
Dear Johns,
Thanks for advice abt other countries using 13A plugs & sockets! Do they
require specific approved bodies for issuing certification like UK?
Regards,
Scott
From: John Allen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Reply-To: John Allen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Date: Monday, 16 July 2018 at 3:45 PM
To: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design of shutter opening
Also used in Malta and Cyprus (even in “Turkish” Northern Cyprus IIRC!) – and
then there is Gibraltar.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: John Mcauley [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 16 July 2018 01:03
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design of shutter opening
Hi Scott
Ireland uses the same plug as the UK as per I.S. 401:1997 - Safety Requirements
For Rewireable And Non-rewireable 13A Fused Plugs.
IS 401 is the equivalent of BS 1363.
Interesting issue about plugs being able to be inserted upside down in some
extension sockets.
John McAuley
From: Scott Xe <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Sent: 15 July 2018 23:32
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design of shutter opening
Thank you for the clarification.
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, 12:47 am John Woodgate, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
GPS applies to anything; that's why is called 'General...'. Anything can fall
within more than one Directive, in fact all electrical products fall within
both LVD and EMCD, as well as GPSD.
BS 136X connectors are used outside the UK; the EU is not relevant to that.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk <http://www.woodjohn.uk>
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-07-15 17:33, Scott Xe wrote:
The product is for UK market only since 13A rectangular pins. I believe only
UK uses this type of plug within EU. As far as I remember, a couple of such
product reviews raised this concern in the past but I did not know the BS
standard does not prohibit it. I am uncomfortable with such design if it meets
the standard.
According to LVD guidance, this type of product falls into LVD, not GPS. John,
how does this product relate to GPS?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
From: John Woodgate <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, 15 July 2018 at 10:53 PM
To: Scott Xe <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>,
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design of shutter opening
I believe that no-one thought of the possibility of a design that allowed that
incorrect insertion. It is known to the responsible BSI committee, but of
course it takes time for the standard to be amended. Until it is, conformity to
the existing standard cannot be denied. However, the marketing of such a device
might violate the GPS Directive in Europe, although that is not certain because
unshuttered sockets are legal in some EU/EFTA countries. Since it only affects
those countries that use the BS136X system, the appropriate regulatory action
may be problematical.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk <http://www.woodjohn.uk>
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-07-15 14:52, Scott Xe wrote:
I received a sample of portable extension sockets with a compliance certificate
of BS 1363-2. It is noted the slim enclosure design allows the mains plugs to
be inserted into the sockets up-side-down by mistake. In such circumstance,
only the earth pin is inserted and the plug opens the shutter of L and N
terminals posting the risk to access the L and N terminals with a test pin. It
is a foreseeable misuse but seems no breach of the safety standard. Can
someone share why it can be tolerated by the standard?
Thanks and regards,
Scott
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
<http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html>
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Mike Cantwell <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
David Heald <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communities site at
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/ can be used for graphics (in well-used
formats), large files, etc.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions: http://www.ieee-pses.org/list.html (including how to unsubscribe)
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>