Chris Morley wrote: > >> I re-zeroed the machine and noted that it showed i was .010" off. Ran the >> next part and it was fine, the second part showed some issues, and > the >> third clearly had a problem. Part is taking 17 minutes, and the properties >> pull down shows 400" of motion. >> > > Just thinking out loud I wonder if this is a left over offset between runs. > Do you use G92 in your program? > > The OP's problem was a shift during the part run, so that one wall of the part was thicker than the opposite wall. So, I don't think it is a G92 offset. That would be more likely to have a several INCH offset between runs, but of course, any value could happen.
You can check for a shift in the machine coordinate system to eliminate that possibility. Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
