At 10:06 AM 3/25/2010, you wrote: >On 25 March 2010 13:45, Stephen Wille Padnos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK, 1527.xxx is what you'd get there. The thing is, microsteps don't > > really increase your resolution, they're mostly there to prevent > > resonance. The number of real steps you have, where the motor has full > > torque, is 190.985/inch. That translates to a 0.005-ish step size. I > > think that might also explain the 0.001 moves - nothing happens until > > you get to the next full step (or close enough that it's the closer > > one), when the motor then clicks over to that full step position. > >More detail on this issue here: > >http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/step/micro.html#limits > > >-- >atp
Andy, Thanks for that. I'll do some more reading. mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
