On 25 March 2010 14:16, Mark Wendt (Contractor) <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, I knew it was close to somewhere around 1500 something.  So,
> based on the 190.985, that would cause resolution problems at .1"
> moves too?  Guessing that the only way to fix this then would be to
> use a different pulley then

Is it really a problem? It isn't like the inaccuracy is cumulative.
Any position of the axis will be +/- a few thou, partly made up of
stepper errors, partly of rack backlash plus all the other factors. It
is most noticable on tiny moves, but I doubt that this machine is
intended to create 0.01" width features.

-- 
atp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to