At 10:36 AM 3/25/2010, you wrote: >On 25 March 2010 14:16, Mark Wendt (Contractor) ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yeah, I knew it was close to somewhere around 1500 something. So, > > based on the 190.985, that would cause resolution problems at .1" > > moves too? Guessing that the only way to fix this then would be to > > use a different pulley then > >Is it really a problem? It isn't like the inaccuracy is cumulative. >Any position of the axis will be +/- a few thou, partly made up of >stepper errors, partly of rack backlash plus all the other factors. It >is most noticable on tiny moves, but I doubt that this machine is >intended to create 0.01" width features. > >-- >atp
I forgot to mention, the machine will be making a one pass cut from strip to finished piece, so all movement will be in one direction on each axis. Backlash should be fairly well minimized because of this. Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
