On Saturday, July 24, 2010 10:35:10 pm Cathrine Hribar did opine:

> Hi Gene:
> 
> hay the info u gave on the 220 motor was great,  I would like to know,
> if u have time, the dif. between a brushed DC motor and a brushed DC
> servo motor if the encoder were removed?
> 
> many thanks
> 
With the encoders feedback path removed, there would be only those diffs in 
the expected rpms per volt applied to the motor from a low impedance 
source.  IOW, no difference if the motor portions were otherwise alike.

That is why you will often see in the surplus catalogs, a reference to 
something like 6000 rpms for a 5 volts supply, or possibly something like x 
rpms per volt.  That would be the balance point where the back emf from the 
running motor has risen to a point where only enough voltage differential 
exists to force the current needed to maintain that 6000 (or whatever) 
rpms.

Also, this generally assumes a PM field motor so that the back emf really is 
a function of the rpms the motor is turning at.  This scales well as the 
voltage rises, until the motor self destructs from overspeed, but gets a 
bit off a straight line scale at very low voltages because of brush and 
bearing friction, but above that point, the scale is a pretty straight 
line.  Mathematically, one could add those friction loses up and come up 
with a generally more accurate picture that is correct mathwise, but isn't 
quite a straight line.

Hopefully I am making sense, the CET in me occasionally forgets that not 
everyone is a CET.  Or an EE, and we have some of those on this list too I 
believe.

This motor of course is a different cat entirely from the one in your 
original question.  The diff to remember is that this motor IS a generator, 
there is no functional difference.  The motor you asked about first, is an 
induction motor, and they do not normally function as a generator because 
there is relatively little field in the armature unless it is being driven 
by the rotating field in the stator coils.  The rotation of the magnetic 
field is achieved by the choices of winding resistance and series 
capacitance between the two sets of coils in such a motor.  Remove that 
field, and the currents in the armature die, which is a very low resistance 
single turn short circuited winding with no connection to the outside world 
except through the magnetic field generated by the stator when power is 
applied.  So a current must be applied to stop them as rapidly as they can 
be started.

This brings up the singular exception to that, which is brought into play 
when the motor is equipt with what is commonly called a suicide brake, 
where a DC current at a low voltage that will cause a stator current 
similar to the current that exists when it is running, but the dc field 
doesn't rotate, so the motor is suddenly very lossy, and stops rapidly, but 
if this current is left on, and you turn the motor shaft by hand, it will 
feel as if the motor is full of molasses.  This is used occasionally in 
power tools that are driven by induction motors.  My 12" mitre saw is a 
universal motor, and much the same effect is available there by simply 
shorting the motor when its turned off.  For those motors that are 'PM' 
fields, there are cautions about shorting them as that can cause the field 
magnets to be over powered and demagnetized, so a resistor is normally used 
in place to the short,  I use a 8 ohm 20 watter for my small mills spindle, 
and when the relays turn it off, it stops in about 1.5 seconds from wide 
open.  That is close enough for the girls I go with. ;-)

FWIW, while this lossyness might sound like it would make a great
dynomometer load, it isn't practical because the armature doesn't have a 
lot of cooling, and that is where all the power goes, so the copper bars 
can actually be melted and destroyed in just a few seconds.  Far more 
practical to use a generator, where the power it makes can be both measured 
quite accurately, and dumped into a dummy load that is actively cooled.  
For hours at a time if need be.

> BILL
> 
> > Cheers, Gene
> > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> > -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> > All men profess honesty as long as they can.  To believe all men
> > honest would be folly.  To believe none so is something worse.
> > 
> >             -- John Quincy Adams
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> > What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> > Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The linuX Files -- The Source is Out There.
        -- Sent in by Craig S. Bell, g...@aracnet.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to