Yes it does sound like a variable reactor setup. The control signal is 
DC and pushes the core into saturation, reducing it's inductance. The 
early BOSS Bridgeport  CNC mills used this sort of setup to reduce the 
idle current on the stepper motors. It also used to be quite commonly 
used on TIG welders to control the output current. These days they do it 
with electronics instead.

Les


On 21/11/10 21:00, Kirk Wallace wrote:
> I have what appears to be a transformer with a reactor in series with
> the secondary. The reactor is used to control the transformer output
> current. I can imagine the reactor will act like a normal inductor and
> impede the AC current, but the reactor has another coil on it. I assume
> this coil is used for current control and works by pushing the core into
> saturation. Is my assumption correct? Would the control signal would be
> DC or some sort of phase controlled signal?
>
>                   Control
>                   Signal?
>        Pri  Sec    |  |
> -------D "        uuuu
>         D "        ====
>         D " C------nnnn----o
> Mains  D " C              Output
>         D " C--------------o
> -------D "
>
> (Just for fun -- I found this link while looking for reactor
> information:
> http://books.google.com/books?id=mtwDAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PP1&pg=PA162#v=onepage&q&f=false
> Short URL http://alturl.com/owob4 )
>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to