On 29 January 2012 18:43, Kirk Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding messing with the g-code interpreter, my vote is that g-code > should describe axis position, feedrate; and spindle speed and > direction, and little more. Everything else should be handled with CAM, > including canned cycles and such. Less is more.
Which FOSS, Linux, CAM system would you suggest? -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
