Andy Pugh wrote: > On 9 Apr 2012, at 18:05, Jeshua Lacock <jes...@3dtopo.com> wrote: > > >> So I had assumed that it was based on the encoder resolution. >> > > It possibly is, but indirectly. It may be that the drives move one encoder > count per input step, so with high encoder resolution you run out of input > (to the drive) step rate. > Yes, on the G320, one step at the input moves one encoder count. The G340 (or G320X with the step multiplier turned on) can move more than one encoder count per step input, but that reduces positional resolution.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
