I've had bad experiance and good. (I'm sorry Les but I'm going to 
contradict you [absolutely no offense intended])
   
  I just have had experiance in diametric opposite to what your 
suggesting. We used to run a machine [centroid, which operates on a 
linx box] that used an SSD and we replaced it [SSD] 6 times [IIRC] 
because of it failing or becoming corrupted. After that I was super 
leary of using SSD's on anything but was heckled into trying it on a 
personal machine that I built in Jan of 2011. It's a Raid 5 setup where 
there are three drives and while I have had to recover once [I didn't 
change the drive out, I just asked it to recover the data and it was 
back working & still is using the same drive] I've not had a spec of 
trouble otherwise. It's running Win7. I'm building a new box for my 
mill and have bought a single SSD for it, because I will only ever use 
that box for running my mill, I am ok w/ the increased risk as recovery 
of the data for the mill is not a large concern [easily backed up and 
restored]. It takes longer to re-integrade it into my network than 
replace the system data for running the mill. Should I have problems 
I'll look at going to a raid system etc. I LOVE the super speed of that 
machine, I've got the 7200rpm high Bit drives on other machines and 
it's slow as 80 weight oil on new years day by comparison. 
   
  One thing that I feel makes a big difference when it comes to SSD's 
is the quality of the drives. I only use Kingston or Sandisk drives, I 
can't remember the name of the SSD's used in the centroid system but I 
do recall they were more 'generic' not something I would have looked 
at as a high-line product. I wouldn't say the issue was with the 
operating system however, I do believe the drive quality did have a 
large impact in this instance. 
   
  Fwiw
   
  Jarrett Johnson
   

On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:24:48 +0100, Les Newell 
<les.new...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote:
On Linux an SSD will last for a very long time. If you are paranoid you
> can use the suggestions on the LinuxCNC wiki for compact flash cards 
> but it probably isn't necessary. 
>
> I would't run an SSD on Win7 or Win8. They thrash the drive nearly 
> all the time and will wear out an SSD surprisingly quickly. 
>
> Les
>
>
> On 02/08/2012 10:50, andy pugh wrote:
> > On 2 August 2012 09:20, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm just looking at a 16Gb
> >> Solid State Drive at £26 but I'm still not sure on the 'life' of 
> that? Will it
> >> get warn out or can we disable all of the log writing. 
> > I have (accidentally) been using a cheap 8GB flash SATA DOM on my
> > LinuxCNC development machine for 18 months. That is several compiles a
> > day, and all the file IO that involves. 
> > No problems so far. 
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. 
> Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the 
> latest in malware threats. 
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>

www.innovention-tech.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to