On 10 July 2013 16:15, John Kasunich <jmkasun...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > I think it is a very low risk change, and should be OK for 2.5, but > since Andy is the BLDC expert (sorry Andy ;-) I'll let him make > the call.
I was very impressed by the results, and the concept makes perfect sense. The patch is very simple, so there isn't a lot that could go wrong. Arguably it could be more general (I am thinking that perhaps we could predict hall transitions mid-thread) but that could be a later refinement, and would be hidden from users. I say push. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
