On 2 December 2013 16:02, Kent A. Reed <[email protected]> wrote:
> One of the things which has long annoyed me is that our configuration > files (INI as well as HAL) do not include a version number which in some > way corresponds to the version of LCNC against which they were written. > A common trick in other arenas has been to introduce this kind of > metadata retrospectively as a comment header The INI Files all seem to contain this: [EMC] # Version of this INI file VERSION = $Revision$ I have no idea what that means, or what it is used for. At first glance it seems that the plan might have been a subsitution of a version number into the sample configs as they were copied across during installation. Or perhaps the plan was something else entirely. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. Download it for free now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
