I think it is quite similar issue like in: https://forum.linuxcnc.org/20-g-code/29662-coordinated-motion-involving-rotary-axis
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Tomaz T. <tomaz_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I'm doing some tests on sim.vismach.5axis running full 5-axis code > (milling sphere with spiral tool path). I have entered max_velocity and > max_acceleration for each axis same as I have on my real machine and also > in TRAJ section. So, when I'm running code, machine (sim) it reaches only > half of its max_velocity, and only thing that helps is to "insanely" > increase max_acceleration for both angular axis. > > So why is there such a big difference, and what else could help to speed > it up? > > > If there is anyone interest to test this (in sim), here is code: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/11501489/5x-test02.ngc > > > My INI settings for linear axis are: > > MAX_VELOCITY: 90 > > MAX_ACCELERATION: 100 > > > and for angular axis: > > MAX_VELOCITY: 20 > > MAX_ACCELERATION: 35 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors > Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. > With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. > Training and support from Colfax. > Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
