I think it is quite similar issue like in:
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/20-g-code/29662-coordinated-motion-involving-rotary-axis


On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Tomaz T. <tomaz_...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I'm doing some tests on sim.vismach.5axis running full 5-axis code
> (milling sphere with spiral tool path). I have entered max_velocity and
> max_acceleration for each axis same as I have on my real machine and also
> in TRAJ section. So, when I'm running code, machine (sim) it reaches only
> half of its max_velocity, and only thing that helps is to "insanely"
> increase max_acceleration for both angular axis.
>
> So why is there such a big difference, and what else could help to speed
> it up?
>
>
> If there is anyone interest to test this (in sim), here is code:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/11501489/5x-test02.ngc
>
>
> My INI settings for linear axis are:
>
> MAX_VELOCITY:   90
>
> MAX_ACCELERATION: 100
>
>
> and for angular axis:
>
> MAX_VELOCITY:   20
>
> MAX_ACCELERATION: 35
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
> Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
> With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
> Training and support from Colfax.
> Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to