Gentlemen,
  When using the R register in the circle interpolation routine the control
calculates the center point. It is almost 100 percent certain the center
point coordinates calculated using the R value are NOT the same coordinates
you use to calculate the IJ registers you put into the routine. Said
another way - the center point calculated using the R register is not the
center of the hole you are wanting to machine.
Just saying
Hth

Stuart

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019, 1:55 PM Todd Zuercher <to...@pgrahamdunn.com> wrote:

> I had taken the time to work out an approximation of a spiral using IJ
> arcs using parametric code for a Fanuc machine once.
>
> Here is what I had.
> %
> #100=0.07 (LOOP OVERLAP SIZE)
> #103=100. (FEED RATE)
> N1G00G17G20G28G40G80G91Z0M5
> G90
> G52X#107Y#106Z0
> G8P1
> M8
> (1/4" O-FLUTE UP)
> G28G91Z0M05
> G90T2002M06
> T102
> M03S14000
>
> (1st pocket)
> #101=1.425  (X POSITION)
> #102=1.925  (Y POSITION)
> #104=[#100/4]
> #105=0.125+#104
> G0G17G55X[#101]Y[#102+0.125]
> G0G43 H2 Z1.0
> G1Z0.25F#103
> G3I0J-0.125Z0.2
> G3I0J-0.125Z0.15
> G3I0J-0.125Z0.1
> G3I0J-0.125Z0.05
> G3I0J-0.125
> N30WHILE[#105 LT 1.25]DO1
> G3 X[#101-#105] Y[#102] I-0.005 J[0.005-#105] F#103
> #105=#105+#104
> G3 X[#101] Y[#102-#105] I[#105-0.005] J-0.005
> #105=#105+#104
> G3 X[#101+#105] Y[#102] I0.005 J[#105-0.005]
> #105=#105+#104
> G3 X[#101] Y[#102+#105] I[0.005-#105] J0.005
> #105=#105+#104
> END1
>
> Todd Zuercher
> P. Graham Dunn Inc.
> 630 Henry Street
> Dalton, Ohio 44618
> Phone:  (330)828-2105ext. 2031
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Dammeyer <jo...@autoartisans.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 12:34 PM
> To: 'Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)' <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] G-Code issue with IJ
>
> > On 09/23/2019 10:35 PM, Chris Kelley wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I suspect the problem lies in the method for calculating CentDist on
> > > line 148. I'm not sure that method actually produces a I or J
> > > coordinate that is equidistant from both the start of the arc and
> > > end of the arc, regardless of decimal precision.
> > >
> > >
> > OK, I have to admit that I have only used this program in the R arc
> > mode, so it is possible I screwed up the I J calculation.  It is not a
> > true spiral, it is a set of 90 degree arcs with the radius increasing
> > slightly every segment.  I've used this for 20 years in the R mode
> > with good results, though.
> >
> > Jon
>
> Hi Jon,
> It works perfectly in the R mode for me too.   And with MACH3 even in the
> IJ mode without complaint.  But LinuxCNC is correct when it reports that
> the Radius is different between the start and end positions by up to as
> much as 24 percent.
>
> Doing it by hand and trial and error I was able to do 90 degree arcs like
> the R mode but the exact calculations to get there still escapes me.  I
> think partly because I was not using the center of the hole as the starting
> position.  For the Mecsoft AlibreCAM example I put the workspace origin in
> the hole center so I could see the symmetry for positive and negative
> movements.  But of course your program has an offset called starting x and
> y which is more logical if we're working off a drawing and positioning the
> tool bit at the center of each round pocket (hole).
>
> What I'm trying to do, and it's really a complete waste of time for me
> since AlibreCAM does it for me, is figure out how to modify your program to
> properly generate the  IJ values.  I don't like not knowing.  I'll be able
> to get back to this later this afternoon.
>
> But do notice from the attached screen shot there's a 1" radius circle and
> then three quarters of a spiral starting at the same spot.  The first two
> I,J parameters have one each set to 0 as your program does.   But the third
> 90 degree arc now adds in the -0.05 width of cut offset into I while J has
> incremented by 0.05.  So the state machine that determines I and J has to
> be a bit more complicated.  It's doable.  Just not sure how yet.
>
> John
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to