Sure, but any chance you can send me the bitcode that the backend fails on?
EMCC_DEBUG=1, and grab emcc-1-linktime.bc from /tmp/emscripten_temp.

- Alon



On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Xuejie "Rafael" Xiao <[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks Mark! Now we don't have the LLVM error as before.
>
> However, I think this time we are hitting something in emscripten. The
> same gist is updated: https://gist.github.com/xxuejie/8384185. This time
> we are getting an error in JSBackend. So Alon, can you help take a look at
> this?
>
> Thanks all of you for your help!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> 肖雪洁
> Xuejie "Rafael" Xiao
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Mark Seaborn <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On 12 January 2014 04:50, Xuejie "Rafael" Xiao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Mark: Thanks a lot for the patch!
>>>
>>>  I did some test using the patch. Clang would indeed stop issuing
>>> errors, however, we are still hitting some errors in llvm. A detailed log
>>> containing outputs before and after the patch can be found at here:
>>> https://gist.github.com/xxuejie/8384185.
>>>
>>> So is this because of some restrictions in emscripten-fastcomp?
>>>
>>
>> Good point.  I didn't notice that because I didn't test it end-to-end.
>>  Here's a fix for the IR simplification passes in the LLVM branch:
>> https://codereview.chromium.org/135953002
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Mark Seaborn <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8 January 2014 15:56, Alon Zakai <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you have a simple solution in mruby source, that would be best for
>>>>> you I think. If not, then we should see about fixing it in clang. My guess
>>>>> is that it is not a deep problem, just a todo, so likely not hard for us 
>>>>> to
>>>>> fix. I've not worked on the clang code before though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark, do you know if pnacl has plans to fix that issue (2381)?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since you asked, I've prepared a fix and posted it for review:
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140106/096991.html
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "emscripten-discuss" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "emscripten-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to