On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:53 +0200, Moon Pearl wrote: > > Also, I agree with Jacob that a strict ordering by difficulty is > > probably not what we want. The first 50 landscapes should be relatively > > easy, though. > > What kind of ordering do you suggest then? I can hardly think of another way > to order levels!
:-) I should have emphasized the *strict*... I'm all for sorting the levels *roughly* by difficulty, but throwing in a few easier levels sounds like a good idea to me. Daniel > > Aurore. > _______________________________________________ Enigma-devel mailing list Enigma-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/enigma-devel
