Hi!

On 2014-02-20 08:34, David Benfell wrote:
> On 2014-02-19 23:12, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> It's not necessary that it become official.  After all, the HKP
>> keyserver protocol isn't documented in RFC4880.  It's just necessary
>> that it become a de-facto standard way of querying for keys.  If/when it
>> becomes a de-facto standard, GnuPG will quickly add support for it as a
>> keyserver protocol, and Enigmail will follow suit.
> 
> I'm not a developer either. That said, when I look at namecoin, I see a
> mess that is a long ways from widespread support. The bitcoin protocol
> (upon which namecoin is based) apparently has problems, which I *don't
> think* impact namecoin, but suggest that bitcoin itself needs to mature
> a bit (which has implications for all of its derivatives).

The "problems" in Bitcoin that recently surfaced have been known since a
long time and only affect certain, discouraged use-cases and Bitcoin
exchanges with bugs in their software and workflows.  The principle
technical "problem" is also present in Namecoin, but it doesn't affect
the security of name storage or anything a user usually encounters at all.

I do not claim that Namecoin has widespread support, but I believe that
it solves a problem that, from what I've heard, a lot of people outside
the Namecoin community believe is "unsolvable" (Zooko's triangle and
secure exchange of public keys).  So my personal opinion is that it
would be great to have (fully optional!) experimental support for this
feature in Enigmail or a related tool where it could really make a
difference for key exchanges.

But of course I understand that this is probably a controversial subject
and there are good arguments for not adding it to Enigmail (yet).
That's why I came here to discuss the idea first.  If there's no other
way, I may actually indeed start with a fork to try things out and let
others test it and see how people like it, but as mentiond in another
email, I think this would be cumbersome since I would also have to
maintain the fork and keep up with upstream releases even when not
related to my own additions.  This is what I've done with pidgin-otr
also, for instance.  (But since they are currently discussing merging
OTR right into Pidgin proper, I've not maintained that and will wait for
the final result of these changes first.)

Yours,
Daniel

-- 
http://www.domob.eu/
OpenPGP: 901C 5216 0537 1D2A F071  5A0E 4D94 6EED 04F7 CF52
Namecoin: id/domob -> https://nameid.org/?name=domob
--
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Hea-Kni-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Mon-Pri

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to