On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:02:09 +0100 (BST) "Dhruba Bandopadhyay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:Ehmm, so, is that the preferred place to report bugs then?
Hello
I realise that the help with e16.6 is voluntary. However, having seen the recent explosion in bug reports on this list I'm beginning
if it would be better to record them officially on some sort of bugzilla web client. This would save duplication and also prevent reports getting lost in the traffic. Or even a web page which updates records of bug reports. Just a thought.
sourceforge.
need i say more? (it has a bug tracking system and we use it already for cvs, www, etc.)
Does anybody actually pay attention to the SF "Support Requests"?
These "Support Requests" seem to me to be a mixture of ancient stuff that should have been closed ages ago, simple questions, and bug reports for all kinds of different things (e16, e17, imlib, epplets, ...), most of which nobody has responded to.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAICS the thing is not even searcheable, which in my opinion means that it is close to useless.
I think that bugzilla is vastly more useful, and I use it myself to try to keep track of E16 issues reported here and there.
What am I trying to say? If possible, I think it would be a good idea to set up bugzilla for E (for bugs, not for support). If not, I think that we should either take the SF bug thing seriously, close obsolete items and respond to requests, or close it down entirely and make it clear that bugs and support questions should go to the e-devel/e-users lists.
Now running off to hide somewhere for a while :-)
/Kim
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
