<quote who="Kim Woelders"> > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> need i say more? (it has a bug tracking system and we use it already >> for cvs, www, etc.) > I think that bugzilla is vastly more useful, and I use it myself > to try to keep track of E16 issues reported here and there. > > What am I trying to say? > If possible, I think it would be a good idea to set up bugzilla for E > (for bugs, not for support).
That's exactly my sentiments. As an example, Gentoo Linux uses bugzilla and the speed and efficiency of problem solving and the resultant time saved is immeasurable. You have my full backing on this one. The only conceivable reason that buzgilla may perhaps not be suitable for E use is that E works on a far smaller scale with regard to number of developers, their development and number of bugs. Nevertheless, it would be still be beneficial. There are certain drawbacks to formalising the bug reporting process as well as there being benefits but a change from bug reports on email lists and stale content on SF would be very welcome by all I'm sure. > Now running off to hide somewhere for a while :-) Yikes! Me too. With regards. -- Dhruba Bandopadhyay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 31628525 | MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
