Unfortunately CSS is a major weak point of mine. Regards, Jonathan Aquilina
On 17/11/2017 02:34, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:38:05 +0000 jaquilina <jaquil...@eagleeyet.net> said: > >> Hi guys this is something I can contribute to in terms of website. and I >> can even host it if you all so desire. Question is do you want this >> built off a framework, such as wordpress where it will be easy to >> include a forums section or something custom built? > > We don't need hosting. We have that. We have a framework: Dokuwiki. Our > content > depends on it and its markdown. It also has discussion forums too. They are > activated on several pages. > > This discussion is really about styling and maybe layout. > >> On 2017-11-16 22:26, Stephen Houston wrote: >>> +1 I've been saying we need a new website bad. And one that is sleek, >>> modern, and yes white. Time to look up to date and kept with the >>> times. >>> You will notice nearly every major linux distribution and nearly all >>> major >>> linux software websites are in the confines of what you describe. >>> Simple, >>> flat, white background and black text, sharp but small images that are >>> mostly subtle, and responsive design to look good across devices. The >>> reason being that this is proven to be the easiest on the eyes and the >>> most >>> pleasing to the reader as you said. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017, 3:58 PM Cedric Bail <ced...@ddlm.me> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As some of you may have noticed we are doing some improvement to our >>>> documentation and trying to get things easier when starting with EFL. >>>> One >>>> of the main issue we are facing is that our website is definitively >>>> hard to >>>> read for a lot of people. So Paul went on trying to figure out why. >>>> >>>> The first problem is actually the constrast ratio between background >>>> and >>>> text. According to W3C accessibility guidelines ( >>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#contrast-minimum )it should be 4.5:1 at >>>> least. Our colors are #818181 for the text and #303030 which give a >>>> contrast ratio of 3.39:1 ( >>>> https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ >>>> ). And it is worth for people with vision impairment where it should >>>> be 7:1. >>>> >>>> Black on white or white on black would work, but according to some >>>> random >>>> person on Internet (could not find a scientific evidence/citation of >>>> it) a >>>> white background force your pupils to contracts, making it easier to >>>> focus >>>> your eye with a smaller pupil (much like the depth of field is >>>> increased >>>> with a smaller camera lens). This could be shown by a test carried on >>>> 136 >>>> subject, where the people reading black text on a white background >>>> scored >>>> better than any other combination of colors ( >>>> http://lite.mst.edu/media/research/ctel/documents/LITE-2003-04.pdf ). >>>> >>>> The second problem are our links that are difficult to tell wether >>>> they >>>> have been clicked on or not. Also they have a slight glow around the >>>> links >>>> that makes them harder to read. The best link on the subject we can >>>> point >>>> to would be >>>> https://www.nngroup.com/articles/guidelines-for-visualizing-links/ . >>>> >>>> So it would be best to come up with a more accessible design for our >>>> web >>>> site. If someone want to suggest a new design within those constraint, >>>> it >>>> would be great, but I would suggest to look at >>>> https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/documentation/ or at >>>> http://doc.qt.io/ >>>> . They are simple and work well in term of readability. We could >>>> easily go >>>> with something like that. What do you think ? >>>> >>>> Cedric >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> enlightenment-devel mailing list >>>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >>> _______________________________________________ >>> enlightenment-devel mailing list >>> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
