On Monday, 10 September 2007, at 16:40:13 (-0400), Youness Alaoui wrote: > > > Well, I agree on what you're saying, and I've thought about it > > > too, but slightly different. I was thinking that E, just like > > > KDE and Gnome, should have its own toolkit, and 'etk' answers > > > that by being 'enlightenment toolkit' (I'm talking here about > > > the key word "toolkit"). So if we compare the words > > > "Enlightenment Toolkit" then ETK is a toolkit... while EWL, > > > "Enlightenement Widget Library" is more of a library providing > > > widgets (which is also known as a 'toolkit' but it doesn't have > > > the 'toolkit' keyword in it). > > > > I really sincerely hope you're kidding. This kind of thinking > > quite simply defies all logic and reason. > > It certainly depends, seeing how your logic work, I understand how > you can't figure out how my logic works.
Sorry, but there is no logic in saying "E should have its own toolkit, and it should be ETK because it has the 'TK' for 'toolkit' in it and EWL doesn't." None whatsoever. Naming is a non-issue and has no bearing on anything of relevance whatsoever. > Oh right, you're completely right.. and since you're not an author > of those libs, as you said yourself, then why don't you just BUTT > THE HELL OUT and stop polluting this thread. Look. You're telling 2 projects you have nothing to do with what they should be doing. Surely you don't think that's acceptable.... If the authors of EWL and Etk had wanted them to work the way you describe, they'd have designed them that way from the beginning. Obviously, they didn't. So what's the point of even making such suggestions? You're accomplishing nothing whatsoever. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "I wish you'd look at me that way, your beautiful eyes looking deep into mine, telling me more than any words could say. But you don't even know I'm alive. Baby, to you all I am is the invisible man." -- 98 Degrees ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
