On Monday, 10 September 2007, at 16:39:20 (-0400), Youness Alaoui wrote: > Exactly, I don't care much about the performance (as long as it's > not affecting usability). I was just answering Michael that his "EWL > has better performance, period." is a bad argument since it is > unproven facts. And I don't care about those 'facts' since ETK > devels could say the same thing, and I was pointing out that the > EWL_Performance page was not very significant if we don't plan to > use thousands of widgets.
And I was pointing out that you are mistaken in that belief. Did you not understand my explanation, or are you choosing to ignore it because you take offense to how I present it? Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux Server/Cluster Admin, LBL.gov Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "What can I do to make you mine? Falling so hard, so fast this time. What did I say? What did you do? How did I fall in love with you?" -- Backstreet Boys, "How Did I Fall in Love with You" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
