On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:00:12PM -0400, Michael Jennings wrote: > On Monday, 10 September 2007, at 16:39:20 (-0400), > Youness Alaoui wrote: > > > Exactly, I don't care much about the performance (as long as it's > > not affecting usability). I was just answering Michael that his "EWL > > has better performance, period." is a bad argument since it is > > unproven facts. And I don't care about those 'facts' since ETK > > devels could say the same thing, and I was pointing out that the > > EWL_Performance page was not very significant if we don't plan to > > use thousands of widgets. > > And I was pointing out that you are mistaken in that belief. Did you > not understand my explanation, or are you choosing to ignore it > because you take offense to how I present it? > > Michael > And did you not read my example of the sorting algorithm or did you ignore it because you take offence to how I present it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
