On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 01:29:41 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:44:01 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com>
> said:
> 
> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:59:13 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
> > <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 21:39:20 +1000 David Seikel <onef...@gmail.com>
> > > said:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:05:12 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The
> > > > Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 11:16:33 +0530 Laxminarayan Kamath
> > > > > <kamat...@gmail.com> said:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > So why not have a real fullscreen (the way apps want it) and
> > > > > > fake full screen(the way users like David Seikel want it)?
> > > > > > That should keep both
> > > > > 
> > > > > david's is already covered by: 1. borderless, 1 + maximized
> > > > > (fullscreen mazimize). the app fullscreen is the "fullscreen"
> > > > > u see in the e menus and the netwm fullscrene protocol. e17
> > > > > doesnt totally handle it right atm - its not "restricted"
> > > > > enough.
> > > > 
> > > > So, what's wrong with letting the user decide they WANT to
> > > > override an apps choice about restricting the user?  It's my
> > > > computer, I want control.  Two options - "fullscreen the way
> > > > nazi programmers that want to take over your computer want it",
> > > > and "fullscreen with full user control".  Oops, I invoked
> > > > Godwin's law early.  lol
> > > 
> > > because we dont even get one way right. not even one works
> > > properly. not goingto go add options and logic until at least one
> > > mode works properly. other than the fact that max+borderless do
> > > what u want. here is no need to have another mode.
> > 
> > That's fair enough then, so long as faking it with borderless
> > maximised windows works.  I have not complained for the years that
> > it did work. B-)
> > 
> > > > I'll say for a third time, my desires used to be covered by
> > > > borderless maximised windows, but it's broken now.
> > > 
> > > works for me. window is without border, the full sie of the
> > > screen, yet it stackable and otherwise able to be manipulated as
> > > a normal window - as you said you desired. keybindings, alt-tab,
> > > desktop flipping etc. continue to work.
> > 
> > See my other email about which apps do not work for me.  
> 
> you can still use keybindings. in fact i'm surprised you don't. as to
> why they disappeared from the menu - don't know. will have to read
> the code to find out, but i'm busy atm.
> 
> > What is alt-tab supposed to be bound to?  I could not figure that
> > out, though I saw it in the bindings, but it showed nothing in the
> > right column when I clicked on it.  Something went wrong there.
> 
> alt-tab... winlist... in default profile. your config sounds a bit
> barfed.

Ah, for some odd reason the winlist module was not loaded.  It is now,
and that part works fine.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to