On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 09:50:36 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> > said: > >> >> >> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 08:29:40 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <vto...@univ-evry.fr> >>> said: >>> >>> no one does agree - thats the point. the point is to force a single style in >>> svn - if people like it or not. it's bypassing the human problem of agreeing >>> on a style and sticking to it - and making it a technical problem - ie >>> re-format the code to forcibly follow a style. well at least we can do some >>> of it in an automated way. >> >> that's nice. My opinion does not count, then ? you're saying that my >> coding style is not worth being used because nobody agreed on it, and >> later you just force *your* coding style whatever people can think of >> it... very nice... > > don't get so touchy. i started and wrote most of efl. and my coding style is > rarely honored fully. everyone wants me to change editors just so i can > conform to their indenting style because their editor is incapable of the > same indentation. don't get your panties in a mess. i sure as hell am not > going > to write up a new formatting config per library, per app, etc. etc. - and if > each one is formatted differently, it causes problems in being able to work on > them. if you get offended by there being a universal formatting style for efl, > then you're doing an awesome job of not helping improve or fix things. I mentioned twice in that ML before that i wanted the same coding style for all the EFL (mainly because of Eina, actually, which has (had, now) 2 different coding styles and because what you use is really ugly. Note that i never told you to change your editor) and that was the purpose of those 2 mails... You answered me that it was useless because there would be no universal agreement... Now, you say the contrary: we must have one unique coding style. So i don't understand... Either you don't care about what i say or else my english is too ugly. > if you notice the formatting doesn't even match what i have used in the past > too Yes. I also mentioned in my mails that my proposed coding style is not mine too... > - it's whatever i can get out of an auto-formatter (uncrustify - it seems > to do a better job than indent and have by far many more options at any rate). > but you didn't seem to pay attention to this. well, you missed my point, that's all (see above). I didn't pay attention at what your script does because it was useless, as it was not the purpose at all of my answer... > you may have also noticed that i > CHANGED my jedrc a few days ago to match the atuo-indenting. maybe you didn't? I don't care about what you do in your jedrc, it's your problem, like it's the other devs problem to do what is needed to respect the coding style. See win32 code or xcb that i wrote, where i tried to respect your coding style. Even more, in Epdf, Eps and Edvi, i used my ugly coding style, Etk style for their etk widget, Ewl style for their ewl widget, your style for their (old) epsilon plugin. If there is a group of people who try to respect the coding style, i'm definitely in. Vincent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
