On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:41:42 +0000 Iván Briano (Sachiel)
<[email protected]> wrote:

> 2011/11/24 Michael Blumenkrantz <[email protected]>:
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:33:22 +0900
> > Mike McCormack <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/24/2011 11:12 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> >> > This is not right.
> >> > GoUn Lee sent a patch to mailing list for the code review and
> >> > this is not reviewed enough on the mailing list.
> >> >
> >> > And I don't think one year internal around means this code is
> >> > correct and does not have to be reviewed enough even I know it
> >> > works.
> >> >
> >> > Impatient mike!
> >> > Anyhow, I disagree with this decision. Once this happens, we
> >> > can't guarantee this will not happen again. And GoUn will lose
> >> > her chance to be reviewed her code enough by open source
> >> > e-developers.
> >>
> >> Goun is only the internal maintainer of this code, not the
> >> original author.
> >>
> >> It has be contributed to by many people internally, which I have
> >> tried to reflect in the commit message.
> >>
> >> Most code committed to EFL (say 90%) is not reviewed on the
> >> mailing list. Has code review suddenly become a priority? :-)
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> Mike
> > The point is that this was submitted for review and then committed
> > after people spent time reading through the code without giving
> > sufficient time for actual review. This wastes peoples' time and
> > will likely demotivate future reviews.
> >
> 
> And I would like to see the improvements in documentation I asked for.
> Code can and will be reviewed in svn, but letting crappy
> documentation in only adds to the work that should be done but no one
> wants to.

I actually like documenting stuff.  B-)

But elementary is not my area, don't know enough about it.

-- 
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to