On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:40:57 -0200 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes <[email protected]> said:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Vincent Torri <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Flávio Ceolin > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi folks, > > >> > > >> I have recently committed in IN-EFL/ecore some patches implementing > > >> support for loadables modules. It makes the engines been loaded when > > >> they are needed. I did not break the api, so each engine still has its > > >> own api. It's far from ideal, should exists one api used by all the > > >> modules but at least until the next version, we need keep the api. > > >> > > >> The modules (engines) usually exports just on symbol, the "new" > > >> function, the other necessary functions are in the engine's interface. > > >> > > >> Some points to considerer: > > >> > > >> 1) I've tested the engines that i'm able to build, which means, sdl, > > >> (opengl,software)_x11, buffer, wayland_(egl,shm). Windows, wince, > > >> cocoa and ps3 i do not even built. > > > > > > i'll try the windows engines > > > > > >> 2) I've commited in the IN-EFL to someone working with one of these > > >> engines try to build and possibly report to me the problems. > > >> > > >> 3) Engines such as (software,opengl)_x11 are been build in just one > > >> module initially and exporting the "new" functions and interfaces > > >> necessary. > > >> > > >> 4) I'm working to port it to new efl tree (expending more time and > > >> been more careful) with the build system. If no one oppose i'll commit > > >> it soon. > > > > > > put the engines in src/modules/ecore/engines, like evas > > > > > > I would like to have at least a diff of the files that are modified, > > > please, before you commit > > > > > >> 5) I break the build between the commits, i did it to make easier > > >> understand how the engines were ported > > > > > > good work anyway :) > > > > > > Vincent > > > > btw, what about doing that for efl 1.7 branch too ?? It's exactly the > > same than what is in IN-EFL > > > > Is there a need to port this to the 1.7 branch? Honestly I believe we > should push only bug fixes there, and this does not directly fix any known > bugs. correct. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
