On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:59:07 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said:
> On 03/04/13 13:52, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:49:25 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> > > said: > > > >> On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> > >>> said: > >>> > >>>> On 28/03/13 13:25, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:49:31 +0900 > >>>>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:56:40 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz > >>>>>> <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> said: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> thats cool. i just had to be grumpy about not having a bug report that > >>>>>> told me what to look at instantly. i have found another bug. single > >>>>>> letter words dont find word end markers. > >>>>> > >>>>> my b, I was previously grumpy due to a certain developer's position that > >>>>> "this is how I like it so we're going to keep it this way". I really > >>>>> appreciate your work here. > >>>> > >>>> Stop slandering me on the mailing list and IRC. I already told you I'd > >>>> fix it, I even asked you to open the bug report so I'll remember to do > >>>> it. I never got around to it, so I haven't done it yet, but I never > >>>> said: "this is how I like it so we're going to keep it". At the > >>>> beginning when you reported this I said: "this is how I like it so I > >>>> initially did it like that" and told you to ask people on the ML so > >>>> people will be able to comment. At some point when I saw people do > >>>> prefer "that way" I asked you to open the bug and told you I'd fix it at > >>>> some point. > >>>> > >>>> Not putting it as a top priority does not mean I'm not going to fix it. > >>>> I don't get why you insist on misrepresenting the truth over and over > >>>> again. > >>> > >>> ok everyone... keep your pants firmly on. this is a pants-on zone. :) > >>> > >> > >> Pants are already on. I think. Will ask around to make sure. > > > > it's always good to make sure... > > > > I asked and only got one reply: > <TAsn> are my pants on? > <SeoZ> maybe not > > So I yet to have a conclusive answer. do you have quantum pants on? maybe if you check for onness there is only a certain percentage change of them being on or not at any point you check, and by checking you alter that percentage chance... -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ras...@rasterman.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
