On 03/04/13 14:03, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:59:07 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> said: > >> On 03/04/13 13:52, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:49:25 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> >>> said: >>> >>>> On 03/04/13 12:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Tom Hacohen <tom.haco...@samsung.com> >>>>> said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 28/03/13 13:25, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:49:31 +0900 >>>>>>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:56:40 +0000 Michael Blumenkrantz >>>>>>>> <michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> said: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thats cool. i just had to be grumpy about not having a bug report that >>>>>>>> told me what to look at instantly. i have found another bug. single >>>>>>>> letter words dont find word end markers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> my b, I was previously grumpy due to a certain developer's position that >>>>>>> "this is how I like it so we're going to keep it this way". I really >>>>>>> appreciate your work here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stop slandering me on the mailing list and IRC. I already told you I'd >>>>>> fix it, I even asked you to open the bug report so I'll remember to do >>>>>> it. I never got around to it, so I haven't done it yet, but I never >>>>>> said: "this is how I like it so we're going to keep it". At the >>>>>> beginning when you reported this I said: "this is how I like it so I >>>>>> initially did it like that" and told you to ask people on the ML so >>>>>> people will be able to comment. At some point when I saw people do >>>>>> prefer "that way" I asked you to open the bug and told you I'd fix it at >>>>>> some point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not putting it as a top priority does not mean I'm not going to fix it. >>>>>> I don't get why you insist on misrepresenting the truth over and over >>>>>> again. >>>>> >>>>> ok everyone... keep your pants firmly on. this is a pants-on zone. :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Pants are already on. I think. Will ask around to make sure. >>> >>> it's always good to make sure... >>> >> >> I asked and only got one reply: >> <TAsn> are my pants on? >> <SeoZ> maybe not >> >> So I yet to have a conclusive answer. > > do you have quantum pants on? maybe if you check for onness there is only a > certain percentage change of them being on or not at any point you check, and > by checking you alter that percentage chance... > >
I only have quantum pants when I'm drunk. And I pretty sure I'm not drunk at the moment. I wouldn't like to check that though, as that check usually alters my state of drunk-ness. -- Tom. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness. Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the Employer Resources Portal http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
