On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:57:16 +0200 Stefan Schmidt <ste...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > > I checked it out. In the end you will have a way to pull of the patch > from github but we still the problem of it not being in phab, where > our review happens normally.
I can mention ability to merge into Phab to authors. > As of right now I want to keep the PR feature of github not used (I > would have disabled it like I did with issues and wiki, but it is > simply not possible). Probably should email Github requesting ability to disable. No clue if that will ever happen, but no harm in asking. > If we get the tooling to get every PR from github moved to phab and > closed and github we can think about that again. > > Having people monitor yet another location for patches is something > to avoid. I agree. I just like to embrace anything that makes contributing easier for others. Ironic as it is a log in for phab is Github. :) Maybe some stuff exists already to move stuff from Github to phab. Not sure about this stuff maybe some others https://github.com/neandrake/phab-utils https://gist.github.com/andytruong/70be048185210faf0de4 -- William L. Thomson Jr.
pgp0b0Gq8TW13.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
