On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:54:45 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:22:35 +0200 Christoph Gysin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > babbled: > > > Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > This leads to a question about the operation of this list. I had > > > MANY off list responses. Is that the standard here? and if so, > > > should there be a summary posting at the end of discussion? My > > > experience on other lists is that we try to get every response > > > into the list unless, of course, its an off topic tangential > > > conversation. > > > > I have the same experience with lots of other lists. Lazy people > > simply press "reply" in their mail-client, which leads to responses > > to the OP directly. > > > > The gentoo mailinglists solve this by adding a Reply-To: in every > > mail header. If people just hit reply, they send it back to the > > list. > > > > Would it be possible to add this also on the e mailinglists? Is > > anybody else interested in this? > > i changed e-users to explicitly set the reply-to for this list to e- > users :) > > -- thx! not paying enough attention it happened to me too that i hit reply and sent mail to sender, not to the list, cause reply-to tag pointed to the sender himself. and the sylpheed feature default_reply_list=1 didn't help, as reply-to "overrides" that. but it was like i somehow blindly sent the message w/ o spending the one second of attention where i sent it :p cheers!
pgpl8bcfLXxRy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
