On Thursday, 07 July 2005, at 09:04:11 (+0200), Christoph Gysin wrote: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > This is stupid.
No it isn't. Just because you don't understand it or agree with it doesn't make it stupid. In fact, the guy is right. Unfortunately, raster is also right -- there are far too many ignorant, lazy, and/or careless users who cannot take the 2 seconds required to check the destination for the reply they're composing. This discussion has reached near-religious status, and it will never ever be settled. Fortunately my e-mail client is intelligent enough to reasonably cope with both settings. When I hit reply, it asks whether or not to honor the reply-to header. Or I can hit group-reply or list-reply to enforce the alternate behavior. So, to those of you complaining about the old behavior without the reply-to header pointing to the list, I have this to say: Get a reasonable mail client and learn to use it properly. And to those of you complaining about the new behavior with the reply-to header pointing to the list, I have this to say: Get a reasonable mail client and learn to use it properly. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Microsoft is trying to sell us crack, and the first taste is free. But what's it going to mean when we're addicted to this?" -- Anonymous, 1998 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users mailing list enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users
