On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 18:37:59 +0200
"R. W. Reese" <[email protected]> wrote:

> El 2016-06-05 21:53, Larry Wyble escribió:
> > I understand there are "lots of ways", EXCEPT using the menu system
> > that is built into the desktop. I also have been using E for many
> > years but I wonder why one would have to jump through so many
> > undocumented hoops to get proper basic setup and usability for the
> > piece of software one is trying to use. If the Ibar setup menu
> > choices were not actually meant to act as one would presume, then
> > why add those choices? Why not document all these hoops somewhere
> > where they can be easily found? Don't get me wrong I love
> > Enlightenment, always have. but the desktop seems to be nothing but
> > a testbed for EFL. If Enlightenment desktop is meant to be used by
> > the masses then it should perform as expected when using it's own
> > menu and configuration system. But it doesn't. There are problems
> > all over the desktop that need to be taken care of.
> > 
> > The point was not whether one could get E desktop to do what one
> > wanted, the point was that one couldn't get E desktop to perform
> > these actions through it's own desktop menu/interface system. And
> > many times there is just no way that one can, unless the SECRETS of
> > how to accomplish these feats are known.
> > 
> >   
> 
> I think at least part of the answer lies in the poll some months ago 
> asking for priorities for E21 and E22:
> 
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/V14
> 
> The decision was to focus on fixing gadgets for E21 and cleaning up
> the settings for E22. With E21 soon to be released, the developers
> will turn, or have already turned, to cleaning up the settings.
> 
> I have been a E user for only 2 years, but I understand the
> frustrations that can arise. One of the beauties of E is that it can
> be so completely customized, at times one (from the masses, like me)
> has no idea what changes result from some settings -- or how they may
> interact. I think we will see some improvement with E22 and perhaps
> the production of more complete user documentation. That is something
> in which many of us can and should contribute.

I have in fact, voted in that pole and I will tell you it was a tough
decision.  lol  


> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and
> traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps,
> and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor
> support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed
> decisions using capacity planning reports.
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
> _______________________________________________ enlightenment-users
> mailing list [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users

Reply via email to