Re: index the message body field? [ =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCImUbKEo=?= ] YES

[Eric Hildum]

Yes, I expected that the UI could not be used - we do want to be able to search from within Entourage, after all. To bad the UI does not allow a plug in specific reference to a location within a file, as that would allow meaningful indexing of library, archive, and similar aggregate type files. Eric Hildum > From: Dan Crevier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 12:37:17 -0800 > To: Entourage mac Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: index the message body field? [ $B"e(J ] YES > > On 11/14/2000 11:51 AM, "Eric Hildum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> To expand on my previous post suggesting using Sherlock; the reason I >> suggested Sherlock is that it is extensible via plug in, already handles >> multiple languages, and would potentially allow a find by content search to >> locate all information on the system, whether in files or email, to be >> found. >> >> Comments on using Sherlock, anyone? > > It's impossible to do it through the Sherlock UI. The Sherlock UI only > finds files. It's not possible to have it show email messages in there. It > is possible to use the Sherlock engine (like PowerMail does), and this is > certainly an option. > > Dan > > > -- > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To search the archives: > <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/> > -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>