On 3/23/01 9:19 AM, "Barry Wainwright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 3/23/01 1:26 AM, "Michael Munger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Christian M. M. Brady said:
>>>
>>>> To clarify: you mean that he could alter the message in some way while
>>>> retaining the complex HTML, is that correct? If so, look in the archives
>>>> because I do believe Allen wrote something to do this in the wake of his
>>>> investigations. I am certain that MS has not issued any sort of definitive
>>>> statement about if/when on implementing this.
>>> __________ End of quote __________
>>>
>>>
>>> No. Simply forwarding the HTML message, without using Redirect or without
>>> modifying anything.
>>
>> I don't get it. If you are going to forward without modifying anything then
>> that is a Redirect. Why do you need anything else?
>>
>> Cb
>
> No it isn't. A redirect will (should) appear to come to the third
> party from the original sender, whereas a forward will appear to have
> come from you.
>
OK. I had thought of that (honest!). But is that such a concern? I normally
just send an email first saying "I am forwarding you a message from Blah" so
that they know it is not unsolicited. Doesn't seem such a big deal to me.
Is this a concern for MS developers? I don't know. MSGuys® is this on your
list of improvements?
Cb
cbrady @ tulane.edu
--
The Bible tells us to love our neighbors, and also to
love our enemies; probably because generally they are
the same people. -- G.K. Chesterton
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
