>On 3/23/01 1:26 AM, "Michael Munger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Christian M. M. Brady said:
>>
>>> To clarify: you mean that he could alter the message in some way while
>>> retaining the complex HTML, is that correct? If so, look in the archives
>>> because I do believe Allen wrote something to do this in the wake of his
>>> investigations. I am certain that MS has not issued any sort of definitive
>>> statement about if/when on implementing this.
>> __________ End of quote __________
>>
>>
>> No. Simply forwarding the HTML message, without using Redirect or without
>> modifying anything.
>
>I don't get it. If you are going to forward without modifying anything then
>that is a Redirect. Why do you need anything else?
>
>Cb
No it isn't. A redirect will (should) appear to come to the third
party from the original sender, whereas a forward will appear to have
come from you.
--
=Barry Wainwright=
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
