on 4/10/01 2:44 AM, Diane L. Schirf at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > VersionTracker went to the MS site, at least, that's how I got it. Well, that's nice - the 'new software updates' depository at my company does not, that's where I got it from. Fact remains, as OTHERS HAVE POINTED OUT, they can get the updater from other people as well. This issue really is pointless. Harry -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To search the archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (concluding... Harry (lists)
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (concl... Stewart Macdonald
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (concl... Harry (lists)
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (concl... Harry (lists)
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (c... Christian M. M. Brady
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (concl... Harry (lists)
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (concl... Harry (lists)
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (concl... Michael W. Wellman
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (c... Paul Berkowitz
- Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved (c... Harry (lists)
