On 4/27/01 11:52 AM, "Bryan Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> On 4/26/01 22:33, Rich Hansen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>>> Just out of curiosity, why would one want to "burst" a digest into
>>>> individual messages, when one can just subscribe to a discussion list in
>>>> individual message delivery mode?
>>>
>>> Because there are any number of lists which come out only in Digest. I
>>> belong to at least two. And yes I burst them for better reading.
>>
>> When there are high-volume lists or lists where there are a lot of
>> attachments (like people with those rotten .vcards), I subscribe to the
>> digest and burst. It's a lot easier.
>
> But doesn't it drive you nuts how 'rage becomes absolutely unresponsive
> while it's bursting?
Hmm. I suppose that may be true, but since 1) digests, by definition, only
come once or twice a day it doesn't happen very frequently and 2) I have
never noticed it to last more than a second or so. Hardly disruptive to me
and my work habits. YMMV,
Cb
cbrady @ tulane.edu
--
"If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything."
~ Mark Twain
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
