on 4/8/02 3:22 PM, Entourage:mac Talk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

> Dennis, have you ever seen this inconsistency in private email messages from
> someone?


Yes, Paul, I see it a lot.  I think Remo misunderstood my posting.  It is
not something that concerns me about the mailing list, although, as I am
typing this, I notice that the attribution line in this message was created
by my pressing REPLY to the digested message.  (I usually remember to change
the subject line so that the threads work).

I checked and found that I do NOT have
Entourage:mac Talk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my address book.

Here's the header of the message to which I replied:

> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from lists.letterrip.com ([66.125.97.11]) by agt-mail.asnap.com
>         (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71608U200L100S0V35)
>         with SMTP id com for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>         Mon, 8 Apr 2002 15:22:28 -0400
> Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:22:38 -0700
> Subject: Entourage-Talk Digest - 04/08/02
> From: "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Entourage:mac Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-- LetterRip Digest ----="
> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


If you want me to take this conversation off-line, I'll  be glad to do that.
Hope you don't mind my using your address as an example.  I figured it would
get your attention and not be misunderstood.



Dennis

 


-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to